Brookville, PA – The two Brookville teenagers who posted a viral video of themselves abusing an injured deer are officially facing felony charges.
18-year-old Alex Smith and a 17-year-old boy both reportedly admitted to everything that was shown in the video that was posted to Snapchat. The pair had gone hunting in Jefferson County on Nov. 30.
The 17-year-old shot a buck from a tree stand but did not kill it. After other attempts, he ran out of ammunition and Smith had no weapon. Smith and the other teen boy took a video of themselves kicking the deer, stepping on its legs, and pulling off its antlers in what they said was an attempt to “finish him off”.
After months of investigation, both of them have been charged with third-degree felony counts of aggravated animal cruelty, conspiracy to commit animal cruelty, tampering with evidence, and other misdemeanor and summary charges.
For the counts of aggravated animal cruelty, there is a possible penalty of up to 7 years in prison and a $15,000 fine.
Although both boys face the same charges, the 17-year-old has been charged as a juvenile and will not be going to adult prison.
The Pennsylvania Game Commission and State Police say they appreciate everyone patience as they worked hard to gather evidence in this case, which has gotten attention not just here in Pennsylvania but also nationwide.
There’s no word yet on when the two teens will be sentenced.
https://www.facebook.com/PennsylvaniaGameCommission/photos/rpp.265766570121909/2918097208222152/?type=3&theater
***
See the full press release from the Pennsylvania Game Commission.
HARRISBURG, PA – The Pennsylvania Game Commission today filed charges against two Brookville, Pa. teenagers who recorded social-media videos of themselves holding down and repeatedly kicking an immobile white-tailed deer.
Charged are Alexander Brock Smith, 18, and a 17-year-old juvenile male. Each faces two felony counts of aggravated animal cruelty and two felony counts of conspiracy to commit aggravated animal cruelty, as well as several other misdemeanor and summary counts.
A detailed list of the charges against each defendant and the possible maximum sentences based on those charges appears at the bottom of this news release.
The Nov. 30 incident for which Smith and his accomplice were charged has been seen by thousands of people worldwide who viewed the videos. The Game Commission became aware of the incident soon after the videos were posted, when one viewer shared a video to the agency’s Facebook page. The agency immediately launched an investigation.
Each defendant was interviewed as part of the investigation and confirmed they were hunting together Nov. 30 in an enclosed tree stand on property Smith’s family owns in Beaver Township, Jefferson County. The juvenile shot and wounded a buck, then missed with a follow-up shot. The deer was immobilized, video was taken, then shared through the messaging app Snapchat. One recipient of the video saved it to his phone and contacted the Game Commission, and his phone, as well as the defendants’ phones, were seized for forensic analysis.
Smith was arraigned on charges today before Magisterial District Judge Gregory M. Bazylak and was released on $50,000 unsecured bail. Paperwork containing the juvenile’s charges also was filed today, which begins the process of the charges being sent to juvenile court.
Game Commission Executive Director Bryan Burhans said the filing of charges brings to an end a thorough investigation about an incident that has drawn much attention and public outrage. Burhans said posts about the incident on the agency’s Facebook page have made clear the contempt hunters hold for the actions depicted on the video.
“Hunters care deeply about wildlife,” Burhans said. “It’s through their decades of dedication to the outdoors that we enjoy healthy and sustainable populations of wild birds and mammals, and that those wildlife species that encounter trouble are identified and afforded additional protection.
“Hunters are taught at an early age to hunt ethically, to be respectful of the game they hunt, the property upon which they hunt and other hunters,” Burhans said. “The Game Commission’s Hunter-Trapper Education program emphasizes these longstanding principles to new hunters.”
Posts by followers of the Game Commission’s social-media pages made it clear that many were keeping track of the case as the investigation continued. Some expressed frustration with the length of time it took for charges to be filed, but in cases where charges likely are to be brought under the state’s Game and Wildlife Code, it’s important to complete a thorough investigation before filing any charges because a hearing on the charges might be held soon afterward, and the case closed permanently.
Even in this case, where there was video of an unlawful act, investigators had to determine it happened in Pennsylvania, where the Game Commission has authority to file charges, as well as collect evidence to prove the teens committed the act and posted the videos.
“It’s easy to understand why people were outraged by the incident,” Pennsylvania Board of Game Commissioners President Tim Layton said. “But the worst-case scenario would have been rushing the investigation and heading into court with a case that wasn’t as strong as it could have been.
“Complicated investigations take time, and on behalf of the Board of Game Commissioners, I would like to commend the Game Commission, its Northwest Region Office and all of the game wardens who investigated the matter in cooperation with Pennsylvania State Police, local law-enforcement and the Jefferson County District Attorney’s office. It’s a difficult job, and you do it extremely well.”
Jefferson County District Attorney Jeff Burkett also spoke of the length of time it takes to complete a thorough investigation.
“Obviously, this case has generated a large amount of public outcry,” Burkett said. “People have assumed that officers have been dragging their feet when, actually, the opposite is true. They have put a lot of hard work in on this case in order to present the case for prosecution. I commend the Pennsylvania Game Commission for their efforts in this matter.”
The Pennsylvania Game Commission does not release the names of minors who are charged with violations of the state Game and Wildlife Code.
Charges filed
Charges were filed today against two Brookville, Pa. teens who recorded social-media videos of themselves holding down and repeatedly kicking an immobile white-tailed deer. A list of the charges they face and the maximum penalties associated with each appear below.
Alexander Brock Smith
18 Pa.C.S. § 5534(a)(1) – Aggravated Cruelty to Animal – F3
Up to 7 years incarceration
Up to $15,000 in fines
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
18 Pa.C.S. § 5534(a)(2) – Aggravated Cruelty to Animal – F3
Up to 7 years incarceration
Up to $15,000 in fines
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
18 Pa.C.S. § 5534(a)(1) – Aggravated Cruelty to Animal (Conspiracy) – F3
Up to 7 years incarceration
Up to $15,000 in fines
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
18 Pa.C.S. § 5534(a)(2) – Aggravated Cruelty to Animal (Conspiracy) – F3
Up to 7 years incarceration
Up to $15,000 in fines
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
18 Pa.C.S. § 5533(a) – Cruelty to Animal – M2
Up to 2 years incarceration
Up to $5,000 in fines
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
18 Pa.C.S. § 6301(a)(1)(i) – Corruption of Minors – M1
Up to 5 years incarceration
Up to $10,000 in fines
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
18 Pa.C.S. § 4910(1) – Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence – M2
Up to 2 years incarceration
Up to $5,000 in fines
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
34 Pa.C.S. § 2162(a) – Disturbance of Game or Wildlife – S1
Up to 3 months incarceration
$1,000 to $1,500 in fines
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
34 Pa.C.S. § 2307(a) – Unlawful Possession Game or Wildlife – S2
Up to 1 month incarceration
$400 to $800 in fines
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
34 Pa.C.S. § 2308(a)(10) – Unlawful Devices and Methods – S4
$150 to $300 in fines
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
34 Pa.C.S. § 2102(a); 58 Pa. Code § 141.20 – Regulations; Protective Material Required – S5
$100 to $200 in fines
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
17-year-old juvenile
18 Pa.C.S. § 5534(a)(1) – Aggravated Cruelty to Animal – F3
Penalties to be determined in juvenile court system
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
18 Pa.C.S. § 5534(a)(2) – Aggravated Cruelty to Animal – F3
Penalties to be determined in juvenile court system
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
18 Pa.C.S. § 5534(a)(1) – Aggravated Cruelty to Animal (Conspiracy) – F3
Penalties to be determined in juvenile court system
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
18 Pa.C.S. § 5534(a)(2) – Aggravated Cruelty to Animal (Conspiracy) – F3
Penalties to be determined in juvenile court system
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
18 Pa.C.S. § 5533(a) – Cruelty to Animal – M2
Penalties to be determined in juvenile court system
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
18 Pa.C.S. § 4910(1) – Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence – M2
Penalties to be determined in juvenile court system
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
34 Pa.C.S. § 2162(a) – Disturbance of Game or Wildlife – S1
Penalties to be determined in juvenile court system
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
34 Pa.C.S. § 2307(a) – Unlawful Possession Game or Wildlife – S2
Penalties to be determined in juvenile court system
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
34 Pa.C.S. § 2308(a)(10) – Unlawful Devices and Methods – S4
Penalties to be determined in juvenile court system
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
34 Pa.C.S. § 2102(a); 58 Pa. Code § 141.20 – Regulations; Protective Material Required – S5
Penalties to be determined in juvenile court system
Multiple years of hunting license revocation
